Sweden's AI Renaissance: Strategic Investments and Policy Reforms Shaping the Future

The Climate Paradox

Why the Future of Power Generation Could Run on CO2

This may seem contradictory at first: in an era when governments and industries are scrambling to cut carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, why are engineers working on power plants that run on CO2? The answer lies in the supercritical state of carbon dioxide, which combines the best attributes of a gas and a liquid.

When CO2 is heated above approximately 31 °C and compressed above 7.4 MPa (74 bar), the sharp distinction between gas and liquid disappears; the fluid takes on the density of a liquid but flows like a gas. This supercritical fluid can absorb heat efficiently, be compressed with little work, and drive turbines that are far smaller than steam turbines.

In this report, we will discuss the sCO2 Brayton cycle, a power generation technology that uses sCO2 as its working fluid. You will see why the idea of using CO2 to reduce emissions is not an oxymoron but a promising path toward cleaner, more flexible electricity.

Along the way, we explore how the technology works (with a simple diagram), compare its efficiency with today’s steam plants, and look at real‑world projects that are pushing it toward commercial readiness.

I - CO2 becomes an efficient working fluid when it goes supercritical

To understand why CO2 is attractive for power generation, it is helpful to compare it with the water/steam cycle that dominates today’s power plants. Water must reach temperatures close to 374 °C and pressures above 22 MPa before it becomes supercritical.

These conditions are challenging to maintain and are rarely used in practice. In contrast, reaches its supercritical state at 31 °C and 7.4 Mpa. When CO2 is supercritical, it behaves like a dense fluid that can be compressed with minimal energy. Tiny changes in temperature or pressure cause large changes in density, which means that the working fluid can extract more energy from a heat source energy. gov. These properties offer several advantages.

• Higher Efficiency: In a Brayton cycle, a gas is compressed, heated, expanded through a turbine, and then cooled. The low compressibility of supercritical CO2 reduces the work required for compression and allows the turbine to operate at higher inlet temperatures, leading to cycle efficiencies above 50%. For comparison, modern combined‑cycle natural‑gas plants achieve ~45%  efficiency, and conventional steam plants average around 33–34 % (Figure 2).

• Smaller Equipment – Because supercritical CO2 has a high density, the turbomachinery (compressors and turbines) can be up to ten times smaller than comparable steam equipment. A smaller “heart” means reduced material costs, quicker start‑ups, and smaller footprints, which could enable modular power blocks that fit on a factory floor.

• Versatility – The sCO2 cycle does not depend on the source of heat. It can be paired with fossil fuels (coal or natural gas), nuclear reactors, concentrated solar power, biomass, geothermal sources, or industrial waste heat sustainable-carbon. org. Because the working fluid remains in a closed loop, the CO2 itself is not vented to the atmosphere; only the external heat source determines emissions.

A simple Look at the sCO2 Brayton Cycle

A simple recuperated sCO2 cycle is shown in Figure 1. Supercritical CO2 exits the compressor, passes through a recuperator that recovers heat from the turbine exhaust, and then picks up more heat from a heat source (burner, nuclear reactor, or solar receiver). The hot fluid expands through a turbine to produce work, transfers some of its residual heat back into the recuperator, and then loses more heat in a cooler before returning to the compressor. Because CO2 remains in a single phase throughout the cycle, there is no boiling or condensation, simplifying the machinery.

Figure 2 – Efficiency comparison. Conventional steam plants convert only approximately one‑third of the fuel’s energy into electricity (eia. gov). Combined-cycle natural-gas plants achieve an efficiency of approximately 45%. The supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle targets an efficiency of ≥50% energy. gov, which would lower fuel use and emissions.

II - A tiny heart with big lungs: compact turbomachinery versus giant heat exchangers

One of the most striking aspects of sCO2 technology is the size of its components. Because supercritical CO2 is dense and compressible, the turbines and compressors are tiny, and estimates suggest that they can be ten times smaller than equivalent steam machines. 

A turbine producing tens of megawatts fits on a bench rather than filling an entire building. Smaller rotating parts reduce capital costs and accelerate start-up times.

However, efficiency gains are costly. To achieve 50 % efficiency or higher, sCO2 cycles rely on recuperators, which are high‑effectiveness heat exchangers that recycle waste heat within the loop. 

These devices are like the cycle’s “lungs”, and they can dwarf the turbines that they serve. Research by the IEA Clean Coal Centre notes that adding a recompression stage improves recuperator effectiveness by several percentage points but introduces extra compressors and complexity, raising costs. 

The same source observes that high pressures near the CO2 critical point reduce recuperation efficiency; therefore, designers must find an optimal balance.

The upshot is a classic engineering trade-off: a small, inexpensive core turbine versus large, expensive heat exchangers. Economists and engineers are working to optimise recuperator design (often using printed circuit heat exchanger technology) and determine when a small gain in efficiency justifies a large cost increase. 

Many demonstration projects, including the STEP Demo, focus on scaling up recuperator technology and reducing costs.

III - A Flexible Ally for a Renewable‑Heavy Grid

As renewable energy grows, grid operators require flexible power sources that can rapidly respond to changing supplies. Supercritical CO2 systems are well‑suited for this role for two reasons:

1 - Fast Ramping and Broad Fuel Compatibility – sCO2 power plants can adjust their output quickly because their turbomachinery has low inertia, and the working fluid remains in a single phase. The STEP Demo project noted that sCO2 technology can respond rapidly to changes in power demand. 

The cycle can be driven by natural gas, solar thermal collectors, biomass burners, nuclear reactors, or industrial waste heat sustainable-carbon. org. This fuel flexibility means that an sCO2 plant can complement intermittent renewable sources: when solar or wind output drops, the sCO2 plant ramps up; when renewables surge, it throttles back.

2 - Minimal Water Use: Traditional steam plants require large volumes of water for cooling and steam generation. In arid regions or during droughts, water demand is a serious constraint. The U.S. The Department of Energy notes that sCO2 cycles are adaptable for dry cooling, meaning that they can reject heat to air rather than water. 

Direct-fired sCO2 cycles can even be net water producers if they use dry cooling. More broadly, the DOE highlights that sCO2 technology has the capability of greatly reducing water usage. This property makes the cycle attractive for concentrated solar power (CSP) plants in desert climates, where water is scarce.

Together, these attributes make sCO2 power cycles promising dispatchable backups for renewable-heavy grids. They can start quickly, require little or no water, and operate efficiently at small and large scales.

IV - Not Just Theory: Large‑Scale Demonstrations are Underway

The sCO2 Brayton cycle is no longer confined to the laboratory. The Supercritical Transformational Electric Power (STEP) Demo in San Antonio, Texas, is a flagship project that brings the technology to a 10‑MW scale. It was built by GTI Energy, the Southwest Research Institute, and GE Vernova, with funding from the U.S.

Department of Energy and industry partners, the $169 million facility aims to validate the sCO2 performance and reliability. Some notable milestones are as follows:

• Mechanical completion and Phase 1 testing – By October 2023, the STEP Demo plant reached mechanical completion and began system commissioning gti. energy. In October 2024, it completed Phase 1 testing, achieving full turbine speed (27 000 rpm) at 500 °C and producing 4 MW of grid‑synchronized power – enough to supply about 4,000 homes. 

The project team hailed this as the largest‑scale demonstration of sCO2 technology to date and a scalable pathway to tens or hundreds of megawatts.

• Phase 2 – Recompression Closed Brayton Cycle – Following the success of Phase 1, the STEP Demo was reconfigured into a Recompression Closed Brayton Cycle (RCBC) with a higher turbine inlet temperature of 715 °C.  The goal is to achieve a net efficiency above 50% and export 10 MW of power for roughly 10,000 homes. Engineers will add a second recuperator and bypass compressor to improve the recuperation effectiveness and study the system response to real‑world conditions.

• Industry Partnerships and Momentum: The project has attracted utilities and energy firms worldwide. In September 2025, Brazil’s Petrobras joined the consortium and provided financial support and expertise. The STEP Demo team emphasizes that the technology can dramatically reduce fuel use, water consumption, and emissions across various heat sources. The data from the first phase will guide the design of commercial sCO2 plants and accelerate their commercialization.

The STEP Demo is not the only program. Governments in Europe (through the sCO2‑flex project) and researchers at national laboratories (Sandia, NETL) are building pilot plants ranging from hundreds of kilowatts to tens of megawatts in size. These demonstrations are crucial for proving the long‑term durability of turbomachinery, heat exchangers, and control systems under supercritical conditions.

Figure 3 - Showing Industry Partnerships and Global Momentum of the sCO2 Technology

Is GHG a Clean‑Energy Workhorse?

The idea of using CO2 to reduce emissions feels paradoxical; however, the science and engineering behind supercritical CO2 power cycles reveal why it might be one of the most important innovations in electricity generation. In its supercritical state, CO2 combines the low‑viscosity flow of a gas with the density of a liquid (energy. gov). 

This unusual behaviour allows engineers to design power cycles with smaller, more efficient turbomachinery, higher thermal efficiencies, fast ramping capability, and dramatically lower water usage. Although high-effectiveness recuperators add complexity and cost, ongoing research aims to optimise them.

With real-world projects like the STEP Demo proving that sCO2 turbines can operate at scale and produce megawatts of clean power, this technology is rapidly moving from concept to reality. 

As we seek cleaner, more reliable, and more flexible energy systems, harnessing greenhouse gases in a closed loop may turn out to be a powerful solution rather than a contradiction.

Hear an arabic video overview of this article https://youtu.be/gfGoeGbLVsI

Listen to an audio summary of this article in Arabic https://youtu.be/gfGoeGbLVsI

References

• IEA Clean Coal Centre – Q. Zhu explained that CO2 reaches the supercritical state above 31 °C and 7.4 MPa and noted that its high density reduces turbomachinery size sustainable-carbon.org.
• DOE sCO2 power cycles – The U.S. The Department of Energy describes how, in the supercritical state, CO2 acts like a gas with liquid-like density and that sCO2 cycles offer higher efficiency and reduced water use energy.govenergy.gov.
• GTI Energy STEP Demo press release (October 2024) – Reports on the 10‑MW STEP Demo pilot achieving full turbine speed and generating 4 MW of power while outlining the transition to a recompression cycle at 715 °C and 10 MW gti.energy.
• Power Magazine report on STEP Demo (October 2024) – Explains that supercritical CO2 allows turbomachinery to be up to ten times smaller than steam systems and that the recompression cycle aims for efficiencies greater than 50% powermag.compowermag.com.
• DOE sCO2 fossil fuel applications – Notes that indirect and direct sCO2 cycles can achieve >50% efficiency, enable compact turbomachinery, and operate with dry cooling, making them suitable for varied heat sourcesenergy.gov.
• GTI Energy update (September 2025) – Announces Petrobras joining the STEP Demo project and restates that Phase 1 testing produced 4 MW while Phase 2 aims for 10 MW at 715 °C.  gti.energy.
• EIA Heat Rate data – Provides average heat rates for steam and combined cycle plants, which we converted to efficiencies for the comparison charteia.gov.
• IEA Clean Coal Centre on cycle configurations – Discusses the recuperated recompression closed‑loop cycle, noting that adding recompression improves efficiency but increases complexity and cost-sustainable-carbon. org.